Passer au contenu principal

Votre navigateur n’est malheureusement pas entièrement pris en charge. Si vous avez la possibilité de le faire, veuillez passer à une version plus récente ou utiliser Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, ou Safari 14 ou plus récent. Si vous n’y parvenez pas et que vous avez besoin d’aide, veuillez nous faire part de vos commentaires.

Nous vous serions reconnaissants de nous faire part de vos commentaires sur cette nouvelle expérience.Faites-nous part de votre opinion

Elsevier
Publier avec nous
Connect

Preparing future health professionals for AI-enabled practice

18 mai 2026 | Lecture de 3 min

Par Ian Evans

doctor and nurse looking at MR images

As AI enters healthcare workflows, students need to know how to use AI-enabled tools with judgment, confidence and evidence from day one.

Preparing future health professionals has always meant helping students move from classroom learning into clinical care.

Now that transition includes AI. New clinicians will need to understand how these tools access, summarize and apply information, and how to use them without weakening their own judgment.

AI readiness is becoming professional readiness

The new nursing findings show where practice is heading:

  • 78% of nurses say skill with AI tools will become an essential part of clinician training and competencies

  • 60% believe healthcare will be dramatically transformed by AI in the next five to 10 years

  • 80% say AI will not replace clinicians, but will become a critical assistant

The task for educators is becoming clearer. Students do not need to prepare for an automated future. They need to prepare for a clinical environment where AI is present, useful and increasingly difficult to ignore.

The work starts before graduation

The pace of change in practice makes early preparation more important.

In Clinician of the Future 2026: Nursing Edition:

  • 43% of nurses say keeping up with medical advances is challenging

  • 42% say keeping up with the latest technologies and tools is challenging

Students should not encounter AI literacy only after graduation, when they are already working in fast-moving care environments.

It should be built during training, alongside the habits that shape safe practice: questioning information, checking sources, understanding limits and applying evidence with care.

The goal is judgment

Future clinicians need more than access to AI. They need the skills to engage with these tools thoughtfully and assess their value.

That means knowing what a tool is doing, where its answers come from and when human judgment needs to lead.

The trust findings make that clear:

  • Only 42% of nurses say they trust AI tools today

  • 65% say ease of use would improve trust

  • 62% want tools that draw from multiple sources

  • 61% want transparency, including citations

For education, the signal is useful. AI literacy is not just about prompt-writing or faster answers. It is about evidence literacy, clinical reasoning and knowing when not to accept an answer at face value.

Better preparation connects learning to practice

The strongest education models will treat AI as part of readiness, not as a separate add-on.

That means using evidence-based resources, immersive learning, adaptive tools, personalized feedback and competency-based assessment to help students build confidence before they enter care.

For students, this creates a more realistic path from learning to practice. For educators, it creates an opportunity to introduce AI as part of how future clinicians learn to think, assess and act responsibly.

This is especially relevant across nursing and medical education, where the goal is no longer only knowledge acquisition. It is readiness for complex, technology-enabled practice.

Preparing future health professionals for AI-enabled care does not mean teaching students to rely on AI.

It means helping them use it well: with curiosity, caution, confidence and a strong grounding in evidence.

Contributeur

Portrait photo of Ian Evans

Ian Evans

Directrice principale, Éditorial, Contenu et Marque

Elsevier

En savoir plus sur Ian Evans