School Meal Charge Policies Lack Standardization, Affecting Equity in Nutrition Access

Public schools, nonprofit private schools and residential childcare institutions can participate in the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and School Breakfast Program (SBP), which provide federally assisted meals through the USDA. These programs aim to offer healthy meals to students, leading to benefits such as improved attendance, academic performance, and food security. A new reportopens in new tab/window in the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavioropens in new tab/window, published by Elsevier, explores the landscape of school meal charge policies, focusing on unpaid meal debt and its implications for children and their families.

While the US Department of Agriculture mandates that school districts implement policies addressing unpaid school meal charges, there are no specific federal guidelines dictating the contents of these policies.With the end of USDA waivers that allowed free meals during the COVID-19 pandemic, many students are accumulating meal debt due to rising costs, which can lead to practices like lunch shaming. The report highlights the need for clearer policies and additional research to address the impact of unpaid meal charges on students and families.

Lead author Albert Pan, BSPH, Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, explains,“Because school meal charges are a concern at a national level in the US and have potentially negative implications for children, more research and guidance are needed on best practices and policies.”

North Carolina has 115 public school districts, with more than 600,000 students not eligible for free or reduced-price meals during the 2019−2020 school year. By the start of the 2022−2023 school year, the state had accrued $1.3 million in student meal debt. To gather data on these policies, researchers utilized Google to locate online school board policies from November 2021 to March 2022, downloading copies from each district's policy manual or website as COVID-19 waivers for free meals were set to expire. Ultimately, they analyzed 103 meal charge policies using a structured data extraction tool to uniformly assess components such as unpaid meal charge limits, actions taken for unpaid debt, and the provision of alternative meals. This revealed significant disparities and gaps in communication about meal charges that could impact families struggling to pay.

This report expands the limited research on school meal charge policies, revealing notable similarities across the US and specific practices in North Carolina. A survey of 50 school districts across the US conducted by the Food Research and Action Center indicated that only 25% of school districts immediately provide alternative meals to students unable to pay, compared to 41% in North Carolina. Furthermore, while 10% of policies mentioned hiring outside agencies to collect meal debt, North Carolina's figure was significantly higher at 63%. These findings underscore the need for clear, consistent policies and the potential benefits of universal school meal programs to reduce stigma and student meal debt.

Future research into the potential psychological damage that children may experience due to harmful unpaid meal charge policies could determine how meal debt affects students. Regular reviews of meal charge templates and collaboration with the organizations that developed them are recommended to ensure that the language used minimizes any negative impacts on children and their families. The findings may influence lawmakers' approaches to school meal charge policies in the future, with federal legislation potentially addressing these concerns by restricting the actions school districts are allowed to implement.

Albert Pan states, “Providing no-cost school meals to all students has been shown to have numerous benefits in addition to preventing student meal debt, such as improved food security, diet quality, academic performance, and attendance.”

Notes for editors

The article is “School Meal Charge Policies Lack Consistency,” by Albert Pan, BSPH; and Jessica Soldavini, PhD, MPH, RD, LDN (https://doi-org.ucc.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2024.06.010opens in new tab/window). It appears in the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, Volume 56, Issue 10 (October 2024), published by Elsevier.

The article is openly available for 90 days at https://www.jneb.org/article/S1499-4046(24)00386-5/fulltextopens in new tab/window.

The authors would like to thank Morgan Wittman Gramann and Marianne Hedrick Weant from the North Carolina Alliance for Health, as well as Lindsey Haynes-Maslow, for reviewing and providing feedback on the manuscript.

Full text of the article is also available to credentialed journalists upon request; contact Eileen Leahy at +1 732 406 1313 or [email protected]opens in new tab/window to obtain a copy or additional information. To schedule an interview with the author(s), please contact Albert Pan, BSPH, Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, at[email protected]opens in new tab/window.

An audio podcast featuring an interview with Albert Pan, BSPH, and other information for journalists are available at www.jneb.org/content/mediaopens in new tab/window. Excerpts from the podcast may be reproduced by the media with permission from Eileen Leahy.

엘스비어 소개

엘스비어는 첨단 정보와 의사결정 지원 분야의 글로벌 선도 기업으로 100년 넘게 과학과 헬스케어의 발전을 지원하며 인류 진보에 기여해 왔습니다. 우리는 170개국 이상에서 학술 및 기업 연구 커뮤니티, 의사, 간호사, 미래의 의료 전문가와 교육자들을 지원합니다. 근거에 기반한 신뢰할 수 있는 과학·의학 콘텐츠와 최첨단 AI 기술을 결합해 중요한 통찰과 혁신적인 솔루션을 제공해, 의미있는 성과를 이루도록 돕고 있습니다. 또한 다양성과 지속 가능성을 제품과 기업 문화 전반에 내재화하며, 우리가 속한 커뮤니티와 협력합니다. 엘스비어 재단opens in new tab/window은 전 세계에서 연구와 보건 파트너십을 지원합니다.

엘스비어는 전문가 및 기업 고객에게 정보 기반의 분석과 의사결정 도구를 제공하는 글로벌 기업 RELXopens in new tab/window의 일원입니다. 자세한 내용은 www.elsevier.com에서 확인할 수 있으며, 소셜미디어 @elsevierconnect를 통해 최신 소식을 받아보실 수 있습니다.